Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. This page may contain affiliate links, which means I may receive a commission if you click a link and purchase something that I have recommended. There is no additional cost to you whatsoever.
Lab-grown meat companies comparable to US–based mostly Mission Barns and Israel-based Aleph Farms (consists of Leonardo Dicaprio as investor), are making cultured meat from animal cells. This course of is usually marketed to be extra environmentally pleasant than beef as a result of it’s predicted to wish much less land, water and greenhouse gases than elevating cattle.
But in a preprint, not but peer-reviewed, researchers on the University of California, Davis, have discovered that lab-grown or “cultivated” meat’s environmental affect is prone to be “orders of magnitude” increased than retail beef based mostly on present and near-term manufacturing strategies.
Researchers carried out a life-cycle evaluation of the vitality wanted and greenhouse gases emitted in all levels of manufacturing and in contrast that with beef. One of the present challenges with lab-grown meat is using extremely refined or purified development media, the elements wanted to assist animal cells multiply. Currently, this technique is much like the biotechnology used to make prescribed drugs. This units up a vital query for aesthetic meat manufacturing: Is it a pharmaceutical product or a meals product?
“If firms are having to purify development media to pharmaceutical ranges, it makes use of extra assets, which then will increase world warming potential,” mentioned lead writer and doctoral graduate Derrick Risner, UC Davis Department of Food Science and Technology. “If this product continues to be produced utilizing the “pharma” strategy, it’s going to be worse for the surroundings and costlier than typical beef manufacturing.”
The scientists outlined the worldwide warming potential because the carbon dioxide equivalents emitted for every kilogram of meat produced. The examine discovered that the worldwide warming potential of lab-based meat utilizing these purified media is 4 to 25 occasions larger than the common for retail beef.
A extra local weather pleasant burger sooner or later?
One of the targets of the business is to finally create lab-grown meat utilizing primarily food-grade elements or cultures with out using costly and energy-intensive pharmaceutical grade elements and processes.
Under that situation, researchers discovered cultured meat is rather more environmentally aggressive, however with a variety. Cultured meat’s world warming potential may very well be between 80% decrease to 26% above that of typical beef manufacturing, they calculate. While these outcomes are extra promising, the leap from “pharma to meals” nonetheless represents a major technical problem for system scale-up.
“Our findings recommend that cultured meat will not be inherently higher for the surroundings than typical beef. It’s not a panacea,” mentioned corresponding writer Edward Spang, an affiliate professor within the Department of Food Science and Technology. “It’s attainable we might cut back its environmental affect sooner or later, however it is going to require important technical development to concurrently improve the efficiency and reduce the price of the cell tradition media.”
Even essentially the most environment friendly beef manufacturing techniques reviewed within the examine outperform cultured meat throughout all situations (each meals and pharma), suggesting that investments to advance extra climate-friendly beef manufacturing might yield larger reductions in emissions extra shortly than investments in cultured meat.
Risner mentioned even when lab-based meat doesn’t lead to a extra climate-friendly burger, there may be nonetheless priceless science to be realized from the endeavor.
“It might not result in environmentally pleasant commodity meat, but it surely might result in inexpensive prescribed drugs, for instance,” mentioned Risner. “My concern would simply be scaling this up too shortly and doing one thing dangerous for the surroundings.”